ÌÇÐÄvlog¹ÙÍø

Skip to content

Animal Ethics Review

All items involving animals for scientific purposes must be submitted to the Ethics Office for processing.

  • New applications must be submitted using the in Ethics Monitor. 
  • To amend or report on existing approvals (prior December 2022), please continue to use the word-based forms and email to the Ethics Office.

The Ethics Office will review the item to ensure key information is contained, and any supporting documents have been attached. The item will then be referred to the appropriate review pathway, and you will receive an email confirming the review pathway.

All new submissions must be reviewed by the ÌÇÐÄvlog¹ÙÍø AEC; this can include (not limited to);

  • Research applications
  • Teaching applications
  • Major amendment requests
  • Standard Operating procedures (SOPs)
  • Milestone reports

Refer to the ÌÇÐÄvlog¹ÙÍø AEC meeting dates for information on submission timelines. 

The ÌÇÐÄvlog¹ÙÍø AEC has established a ÌÇÐÄvlog¹ÙÍø AEC Executive, as per the Code; the ÌÇÐÄvlog¹ÙÍø AEC has delegated for the Executive to review minor amendments. The ÌÇÐÄvlog¹ÙÍø AEC may also delegate other items to the ÌÇÐÄvlog¹ÙÍø AEC Executive for review. 

For example, an application that receives a "Subject to modifications" outcome at a ÌÇÐÄvlog¹ÙÍø AEC meeting - the ÌÇÐÄvlog¹ÙÍø AEC will generally delegate the ÌÇÐÄvlog¹ÙÍø AEC Executive to review and approve the revised submission.

An item reviewed by the ÌÇÐÄvlog¹ÙÍø AEC will receive one of the following outcomes:

  • Approved – Application is approved with standard conditions;
  • Approved (with additional conditions) - Application is approved with extra conditions (specific to the project) in addition to the standard conditions;
  • Subject to modifications (previously "Conditional approval") – this outcome includes written feedback for addressing and/or defending. The revised application and response to feedback will generally be reviewed by the ÌÇÐÄvlog¹ÙÍø AEC Executive;
  • Not approved (Re-submission permitted) – this outcome includes written feedback for addressing and/or defending. The revised application and response to the feedback will be submitted to the next available ÌÇÐÄvlog¹ÙÍø AEC meeting for review. 
  • Not approved (Re-submission not permitted) – this outcome includes written feedback; however, a new application is required to be submitted to the ÌÇÐÄvlog¹ÙÍø AEC if the research is to proceed.